Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Business Idea
Problem severity, solution logic, and whether the differentiation claim holds up outside the founder’s own framing.
DDScore.ai provides structured first-pass diligence scoring and analysis for private company investment materials. More coverage, fewer missed winners, and documented rigour on every pass.
Zero Trace · EU servers & GDPR · No training on your data
The top 10% of venture investments generate 60–80% of all venture returns. Nearly every fund that returns 3x or more has at least one company that returned the entire fund.
That number defines the job. It is not avoiding losses. It is not missing the winner. Every screening decision carries two costs: the false positive that burns diligence weeks, and the false negative that becomes someone else’s fund returner.
AI tools turn limited inputs into convincing decks, financial narratives and market stories in hours. The average first-pass read is under four minutes per deck. At that speed, weak assumptions stay hidden and real winners get skimmed past. A summary does not test whether the case holds together.
A structured report on every deal changes the shape of the funnel, not just the speed of reviewing it.
Steer over time. Re-scoring the same company resurfaces the key next steps, round after round. In our worked model, this lifts expected return per invested euro from 1.20x to 1.86x.
DDScore is built to expose the weak assumptions that often survive a fast first read because the presentation feels coherent.
DDScore analyses each business through the same 12-dimension structure. Each dimension receives its own score and contributes to the overall Due Diligence Score through stage-aware weighting. Each dimension is analysed separately, but the overall score reflects how the dimensions interact: evidence quality, risk, stage, business model and the strength of the case as a whole.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Problem severity, solution logic, and whether the differentiation claim holds up outside the founder’s own framing.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Product maturity, feature defensibility, and whether the delivery risk is acknowledged or obscured.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Verified backgrounds, identified capability gaps, and commitment levels for each named member.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
TAM and SOM credibility, penetration assumptions relative to the proposed budget, and competitive density in the actual target segment.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Who is actually operating in the market, including the names the deck chose not to include.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Moat strength, replication risk, dependency exposure, IP ownership, and the credibility of any patent or trade secret claims.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Unit economics at scale, infrastructure headroom, and the constraints that cap growth before the projections assume it begins.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Compliance exposure, regulatory risk in target markets, licensing obligations, and jurisdictional constraints relevant to the business model.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Exit scenarios with probability weighting, acquirer logic grounded in sector comparables, and return multiple analysis.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Structural coherence and narrative flow. Consistency between pitch materials, website, and public presence. Visual quality and factual accuracy across all submitted materials.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Projection stress-testing against sector benchmarks and mathematical constraints. Bottom-up plausibility assessment of the key assumptions.
Example score only. Your report scores each dimension based on your submitted materials.
Valuation relative to comparable transactions, use of funds coherence, and round structure risk.
The DD Score is a single number between 0 and 100. It is a summary, not a conclusion. The value is in what sits behind it: twelve assessed areas, each with a full analysis page and a structured breakdown of Strengths, Areas for Development, and Risks, drawn from the specific materials submitted and cross-referenced against current market intelligence.
The score tells you which deals deserve deeper work. The analysis tells you exactly what that work should focus on, and what the materials are not telling you.
No. The score is the starting point, not the conclusion. The value of the report is in the analysis behind the number — twelve assessed areas each explaining the reasoning, the evidence, and what is missing.
A score of 28 indicates elevated risk. The report explains why. It may show that the competitor section omits a heavily funded direct rival, the financial projections require acquiring 27 customers per month from day one without a sales hire, or a key technical claim cannot be corroborated through any available public source. That is the difference between a number and an answer.
A score indicates where risk may exist. A diligence finding explains the reason for that risk and what should be reviewed before moving forward.
Angel investors and syndicates often review a high number of opportunities without a dedicated analyst team. DDScore provides a structured first-pass review that helps identify which companies require deeper attention and which carry structural problems that make deeper work premature.
VC analysts can use DDScore before internal reviews or partner meetings. The report provides structured findings, risks, and questions instead of relying only on a first reading of the deck — making the analyst’s time more valuable in the meeting itself.
Family offices often review broad and opportunistic deal pipelines. DDScore creates a consistent analytical format across companies that may differ by sector, stage, geography, and quality of materials — making comparison meaningful rather than impressionistic.
Corporate venture and M&A teams can use DDScore for a baseline assessment of inbound opportunities before committing internal resources to a full diligence or data room process. Identify quickly which opportunities are worth the cost of deeper engagement.
Investment materials often contain confidential information including non-public financials, technical details, and materials covered by NDAs. For DDScore, security is not an additional feature — it is a core requirement of the service. All materials are processed on EU servers and deleted within 24 hours.
DDScore follows a Zero Trace Policy. Uploaded materials and generated reports are permanently deleted within 24 hours of report completion, regardless of whether the report has been downloaded.
No. Submitted materials are not used to train DDScore models or any third-party AI models, under any circumstances.
Processing takes place on servers located within the European Union under Finnish jurisdiction.
Yes. Formal non-disclosure agreements are available on request for institutional users and investors operating under fund-level confidentiality requirements.
Run a structured report before your next pass. Free trial available.
Designed for experienced investors and professional evaluators.
DDScore does not provide investment advice and does not tell users what decision to make. DDScore provides analytical tooling and quantitative scoring based on submitted materials, available information, benchmarks and the DDScore scoring model. It supports judgement and due diligence workflows. It does not replace investor judgement or a full due diligence process.
Investing in private companies involves significant risk, including the possible loss of all invested capital.